.

Sunday, February 3, 2019

Welfare and Social Responsibility :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

Welfargon and brotherly Responsibility Welfare. Read that word to yourself and ask what popular images surround it. The first of all thing is probably women and children. This one is correct, because 97% of AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children, the federal public assistance program) is made up of women and children. Young women? Not really-the number age of a mother receiving welfare is 29, and only 7.6% are under the age of 20. Is she dour? Maybe, because the composition of the welfare roles is about the same percentage black and white. to a greater extent kids than she can count? The average welfare family has 2.9 members. That means a whizz mom would have 1.9 children (fewer than the national average). Forever dependent?-the average duration of a stay on welfare is 22 months. We certainly deem that they dont work. Without bringing up the question of why raising children is not considered work, the average AFDC benefit plus food stamps still is only 69% of the dis tress line. Women on welfare are constantly working to make up that difference. Do we think of welfare as expensive? AFDC represents just all over 1% of the national budget. If welfare is not about young women having sepa measure of babies and living their life off the generosity of the state, and if its a minuscule character reference of the federal budget, why have Republicans chosen it as their pilot subject field? Why, when our Federal Reserve is raising interest rates and attempting to maintain an unemployment rate of 6.2%, and when a job at minimum wage would still set forth a mother with two children 23% below the poverty line, is transfix into the paid workforce being pushed as the panacea for poverty? If we are serious about getting state to work we need relevant training programs, child care provisions, and efforts at job creation. These at least(prenominal) were discussed in the Clinton plan, if the plan was in many other ways as punitive and insubstantial as the Republican plan. The Republican ideology is in particular insidious because it shifts the entire frame of debate from the structural to the moral. It implies, even states, that if those people would just clean up their morals and stop being so lazy that they could have a place in the American Dream. nowadays welfare moms are understood to be the symbol for all that is chastely wrong with America.

No comments:

Post a Comment